Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Smith's avatar

One thing to add to the pile of things to think about: what used to constitute "data" 20 years ago is very different than what we think of as data today. For instance, likes and comments weren't really a thing back then, so it was difficult to anticipate what sort of data might need protecting.

I bet we're in a similar area today, where just about nobody is thinking about protecting certain types of data, and it's going to be used to make gobs of money and cause unintended consequences. Only time will tell what those blind spots are today.

Expand full comment
Robert Racansky's avatar

> Surrendering our Legal Rights

> Accepting payment for our data will undoubtedly require us to sign over our, constitutionally guaranteed, Rights over to these companies. This makes us uninvolved and powerless to stop them from using the data generated for harmful reasons.

Or worse, people will end up being required to pay those who are collecting their data.

For example:

"Smart meters" leak all sorts of data; i.e., By keeping granular track of water and electricity usage, somebody with access to that data can figure out what time you wake up, when you use the toilet, when you take a shower, when you go to work, when you get home, etc.

What happens when these devices become mandated by your H.O.A.? Five years ago, real estate attorney John Cowherd asked

> What lawyers & experts are exploring emerging legal issues in "smart homes?" What happens when the "smart home" industry starts teaming with the community association industry?

> I think that the greatest area for privacy law etc. issues will come from smart condominium complexes, where you could have multi-owner information collection by the same people who are dolling out nonjudicial fines, liens, foreclosures for violation of rules, etc..

> The insecurity of IoT [internet of things] plus the dysfunction of HOA governance - add where HOA’s have “right of entry for inspection” - is a perfect storm for massive invasion of privacy in our homes.

Imagine having a doorbell camera and/or network-connected door lock that does not report to you the homeowner, but is accessible and controlled by your H.O.A. board and manager.

Since H.O.A. documents are enforced as contracts * , the affected homeowner will have effectively surrendered their legal rights.

* Whether they should be enforced as contracts is another matter. My position is obviously "no".

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts